Subject: RE: Xsl problem (template matching) From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 14:54:39 -0000 |
> <xsl:template match="//display-type"> > <!--rules here --> > </xsl:template> > > If your display-type node sits directly beneath another node > you are using a template match for, then the // isn't necessary. Or is the > above approach poor form? I can think of instances where the // might be useful for > extracting deeply nested nodes of interest. Thanks. > The patterns X and //X match exactly the same nodes, their only difference is that they have different default priority. For example "*" has lower default priority than "TITLE", but "//*" has higher default priority. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Xsl problem (template matching), Richard Lander | Thread | xsl:message conformance, Mark D. Anderson |
Re: well-formed output XML (was: wh, Phil Lanch | Date | Re: well-formed output XML (was: wh, Phil Lanch |
Month |