Subject: Re: Getting a longest node From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 19:30:03 +0000 (GMT) |
Wendell Piez writes: > >last one. I append my (uncommented) code which attempts to work out > >column widths for a table by adding together all the cell lengths in > >each column and working out proportions > > That's pretty cool, I'll try it. Am I going to need the extension function > to get access to the value? That could trouble the purist (or portability > freak). I have stoppped worrying about a) the node-set extensions b) the ability to write several output documents they seem so sensible and uncontroversial that I just assume they'll make it into XSLT 2.0. I am sure there are plenty of solutions which don't need the node-set thing, of course; it's just that it's fun... sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Getting a longest node, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: Getting a longest node, Phil Lanch |
RE: Getting text out of mixed conte, Wendell Piez | Date | RE: Modular File Organization, Khun Yee Fung |
Month |