Subject: RE: JavaScript From: "Duane Nickull" <duane@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:21:47 -0800 |
: Duane Nickull >CLIENT SIDE: > >The role of the comment is very clear. It simply prevents the >JS from being >displayed as text in non-JS aware browsers. Are we talking >XML/XSL parsing >in browsers that do not recognize JS? There are no such browsers. : Dave P said Beg to differ. Try js in Lynx. Unsure about Opera too. Most access technology in js unaware. Implication? Try page comprehension with your eyes closed, using Lynx, on one of your js loaded pages. Then think about doing that each time you visit a web page. <IMHO> Neither Opera nor Lynx fully support XML/XSL. My comments refer to the fact that it is generally *OLDER* browsers that do not support javascript. As far as I know, there are no older browsers that fully support XML/XSL yet do not support javascript. Therefore, if a browser is capable of parsing XML/XSL, it should have javascript implementation. I looked at the Lynx pages - very cool!! Duane Nickull XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: JavaScript, Pawson, David | Thread | XSL FO question: Border/Padding and, MURAKAMI Shinyu |
RE: Which one to choose, Didier PH Martin | Date | xsl:call-template question, Joni Fazo |
Month |