Subject: Re: Crazy idea: loopback namespace From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:09:59 -0500 |
Another way to implement the loopback scheme would be to use multiple output documents. You could mark one of these are being for loopback purposes. In this case the output document would be kept internally by the XSL processor in tree form allowing efficient access with the document() function. With my original loopback namespace idea I had forgotten about the problem of context in the source tree. Creating dynamic, intermediate documents fixes the context problem. Loopback was an attempt at a solution for: 3) No ability to generate intermediate XML and apply style rules to it. Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Crazy idea: loopback namespace, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Crazy idea: loopback namespace, David Carlisle |
Re: Crazy idea: loopback namespace, David Carlisle | Date | Problems with Copy-of with xalan, menkell |
Month |