Re: XSL Theory

Subject: Re: XSL Theory
From: Steve Schafer <pandeng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:07:07 -0600
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:22:53 -0500, you wrote:

>The restrictions on no side effects and the one way (input to output
>transform) nature of XSL should make this a much easier problem than the
>general problem of proving the correctness of computer programs.

Sure, but "much easier" than "completely intractable" doesn't
necessarily mean "easy." :)

I can easily produce an example XSLT transformation that will be
correct as long as Goldbach's Conjecture is true, but will fail if it
is false. Obviously, it would be a contrived example, but the fact
that it exists demonstrates that you can't have any generalized
confidence in XSLT.

-Steve Schafer


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread