Subject: RE: preceding-sibling with sorted for-each From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 17:08:37 -0000 |
> Saxon saxon:node-set() [documented] and also saxon:nodeset() > [undocumented] Actually it's documented that in matching XSL function names to Java method names all hyphens are ignored, so you can happily write n---odese---t() if it takes your fancy. I documented it as node-set because that's the usual XSLT way of spelling it. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: preceding-sibling with sorted f, Steve Tinney | Thread | Re: preceding-sibling with sorted f, Steve Tinney |
Re: Measuring length of the text in, Steve Tinney | Date | RE: Measuring length of the text in, Kay Michael |
Month |