Subject: RE: Microsoft XSL and Conformance From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 09:11:12 -0800 |
Awesome move, Andy! Amazing how quick the mob dispersed... > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Kimball [mailto:akimball@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 1:37 AM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Microsoft XSL and Conformance > > > Hi all, > > I'm Andy Kimball, the Microsoft XSL developer. After today's "nested > template abomination" discussion, I had a couple of comments. First, > Microsoft is committed to delivering a conformant XSLT > processor. If you > don't believe "Microsoft", then at least believe me. I'm > writing the thing. > I've often gritted my teeth and implemented some feature that > I thought was > inelegant, less than useful, or arbitrarily limited, just to > be compliant. > As I receive feedback from the XSL community, I've been > surprised at how > vocal and passionate people are about conformance (of course, > people also > want performance, scalability, and usability without any > trade-offs, and > they want it yesterday--unrealistic, but understandable). > Now, I may not be > able to cross every tiny 't', and dot every insignificant > 'i', but I will > make a good-faith effort to implement according to the 1.0 > spec. If you > find conformance problems that concern you, feel free to e-mail me at > akimball@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ~Andy Kimball > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Microsoft XSL and Conformance, Dan Morrison | Thread | Re: Microsoft XSL and Conformance, Jonathan Borden |
RE: MSXML abominations happening fo, Eileen Kinley | Date | RE: Trying to create <a href=xxx> u, Way, Janet |
Month |