|
Subject: Re: possible to mimic while-like behavior? From: "Nikolai Grigoriev" <grig@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 03:40:11 +0300 |
Carole E. Mah wrote:
> Imagine,
> <xsl:for-each select="foo">
> <xsl:choose>
> <xsl:when test="bar">blah</xsl:when>
> <xsl:otherwise>blort</xsl:otherwise>
> </xsl:choose>
> </xsl:for-each>
>
> Now imagine that when the conditions are such that <xsl:otherwise> is
> matched, one wants to break out of the <xsl:for-each>.
>
How about this:
<!-- Identify the stopper - the first node that does not have a bar -->
<xsl:variable name="stop-id" select="generate-id(foo[not(bar)][1])"/>
<!-- Segregate nodes preceding the stopper -->
<xsl:for-each select="foo">
<xsl:if test="following-sibling::foo[generate-id() = $stop-id]">
blah
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
This is simple but suspicious from the efficiency point of view.
I suspect that the recursive solution is more economic.
Regards,
Nikolai
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: possible to mimic while-like be, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: possible to mimic while-like be, Carole E. Mah |
| Re: how do you get non-xhtml data t, Steve Muench | Date | Re: possible to mimic while-like be, Mike Brown |
| Month |