Subject: RE: Microsoft XSL and Conformance From: "Chris Bayes" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 14:12:23 -0000 |
And where is the COM interface to make it easy to use with IIS servers. It is pointless sitting on your high horse with one of the best solutions and slagging off MS when your solution is no solution at all unless you want to sit in front of a DOS window and translate all your documents by hand. -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kay Michael Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 07:38 To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: Microsoft XSL and Conformance > Anyway, from what I understand, most, if not all, products > mentioned on this list have their own extensions and are any 100% fully compliant? Saxon has been 100% compliant since release 5.0, unless you count bugs. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Microsoft XSL and Conformance, Kay Michael | Thread | RE: Microsoft XSL and Conformance, Juergen Hermann |
[no subject], Tim Mogler | Date | RE: Microsoft XSL and Conformance, Larry Mason |
Month |