Subject: RE: Future XSLT extensions. document(). Summary. From: Scott Sanders <ssanders@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:06:37 -0800 |
Didier said: I am now too tired to argue and will just express an opinion. I totally disagree with you on (C). The actual document() function is and will be tremendously useful for XML based web services. I am in total agreement. The document() function is THE MOST USEFUL item in XSLT, unless you count the entire concept of XSLT. I am defining screens in XML, and process them through XSLT. Any listbox that needs to be filled is filled using the document() function to get that list from the database. Without the document() function, XSLT is extremely limited. Scott Sanders XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Future XSLT extensions. documen, Didier PH Martin | Thread | Re: Future XSLT extensions. documen, Paul Tchistopolskii |
Using XSLT with relative path on XS, Way, Janet | Date | Re: What is the value of an undefin, Wendell Piez |
Month |