Subject: RE: position() From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:59:26 +0100 |
> then the xpath expression selects "the second occurence of C which is a child of A", not "the > second child of A with the condition that it is a C element". > > Is this the correct behaviour? Yes. > > The only way to select the second child of A is "A/*[position()=2]" > but in this case you can not be sure that it is a C element Write A/*[2][self::C] Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: position(), David Carlisle | Thread | RE: Using xml:base in an xsl:styles, Kay Michael |
RE: Variables in XPath expressions, Kay Michael | Date | Interaction xsl-javascript-html, Gines Carrillo i Cav |
Month |