Subject: Re: Dumb question from a newbie on XSLT in IE5 From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:27:00 -0700 (MST) |
> Does the group think this is actually the way things will move, or was > this 'URI as a syntax definition' just a quick hack? As David mentioned, it's a W3C Recommendation (XML Namespaces). Someone also said on this list at one point in the recent past that URIs are a convenient standard (there's an RFC for them) for the syntax of identifiers. Personally I think that it is good form for a URI to Uniformly Identify a Resource that actually exists, but the W3C Recs specifically say otherwise. - Mike ___________________________________________________________ Mike J. Brown, software engineer, Webb Interactive Services XML/XSL stuff: http://www.skew.org/ http://www.webb.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Dumb question from a newbie on , David Carlisle | Thread | RE: Dumb question from a newbie on , Paal Eriksen |
Re: Flat file conversion to XML, Mike Brown | Date | excluding namespaces, Louis-Dominique Dube |
Month |