Subject: Re: Dumb question from a newbie on XSLT in IE5 (Namespaces etc) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 17:20:24 GMT |
> I don't think I want to go much further down this path (might give > people some annoying ideas) but does this attitude mean that there can > never be an XSL 2.0? I am sure there will be a version 2 or 1.1 or whatever it is called, but it will use the same namespace as version 1, but a different value for the (mandatory) version attribute. <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="2.0" > The spec has a section about how XSL 1.0 processors are supposed to handle such a file. Ie a file that unambiguously is XSL but of a later version than the application handles. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Dumb question from a newbie on , David Carlisle | Thread | Is there an email list for XML-Sche, Trevor.ioz |
Re: Dumb question from a newbie on , David Carlisle | Date | Re: Result Tree Fragments & Variabl, David Carlisle |
Month |