Subject: Re: XML+XSL= XML only? From: barrys@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 15:37:09 +0100 |
> Jens Lautenbacher wrote: > >it _can_ be cumbersome... but still I would be interested more in what >you are doing. this sounds extremely interesting. We have designed a set of Java/C++ classes that interface to a SAX parser to handle the events that are generated when our application XML documents are parsed. There is one class for each different type of element that can occur within our messages. Each class is designed to validate and process the child elements that its corresponding element contains. As we parse any given input XML document we build up a hierarchy of objects of classes that match the document elements that we have encountered. The input to our Java/C++ class generator is an XDR schema that describes the format of the XML messages that pass between the two endpoints in our application. This schema is supplied as input to an XSLT processor along with an XSLT stylesheet that defines the desired content of our Java/C++ classes. The stylesheet matches each XDR ElementType definition with the schema and generates the corresponding class files. We are using James Clark's XT processor and its xt:document extension function to generate Java, C++ header and C++ implementation files in parallel. I hope this brief description helps. Stuart Barry Chief Technical Officer ACI Worldwide (EMEA) Ltd. 59 Clarendon Road WATFORD Herts WD1 1LA United Kingdom Tel: +44 1923 813907 Fax: +44 1923 813935 e-mail barrys@xxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XML+XSL= XML only?, Jens Lautenbacher | Thread | RE: XML+XSL= XML only?, Joel Hughes |
RE: xsl:fo Syntax?, Medina, Edward | Date | RE: XSL/XSLT components on Wintel, MarkH |
Month |