Subject: RE: "Translate function" From: "Medina, Edward" <emedina@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 07:25:27 -0400 |
So although you are not saying that saxon is better, it is however the latest state of the art model vehicle on the street. If it works better is more of matter of opinion. Thanks once again Dave -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 2:45 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: "Translate function" > Does it work better than saxon? What sort of question is that:-) Since the author of each of these packages is on this list, what can I say? xt was first, because it is written by the editor of the xslt spec. Saxon is currently more complete (has keys for instance) I have xt saxon xalan and oracle's xsl system installed (and if i drag myself out of my desk I can find a machine running some strange operating system that is apparently required to use msxsl preview release) I use xt usually, probably because it is less to type. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: "Translate function", David Carlisle | Thread | RE: "Translate function", Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: <xsl:if>, David Carlisle | Date | Re: <xsl:choose> <xsl:when> and gra, David Carlisle |
Month |