<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

RE: "Translate function"

Subject: RE: "Translate function"
From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 10:56:42 -0400
Hi David,

David said:
saxon is more complete, xt is usually faster, msxsl has better
integration into a browser. It just depends whether you want
a BMW or a Rover.

Didier replies:
I guess that you meant that XT is faster than the other java based
implementations. Now you raised the point in my mind that it would be
interesting to benchmark Transformiix and msxml to see how fast they are
compared to the fastest java based implementation.

cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Conferences: XML Europe (http://www.gca.org)
Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com)
column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com)
Products: http://www.netfolder.com


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: "Translate function", David Carlisle Thread RE: "Translate function", Medina, Edward
RE: "Translate function", Didier PH Martin Date RE: Where to find good Xsl example?, Moazzam Ahmed
Month