|
Subject: RE: alpha comparison From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:40:36 +0100 |
>> Is the sorted output tree count
>> identical to the
>> unsorted input count.
>
>xsl:sort doesn't remove duplicates, so if by count you meant count(),
>the numebr of nodes in the list, then the answer is always yes
>isn't it?
Not with the sort of mistakes I make David :-)
I presumed (wrongly) that the input nodes were
already sorted, hence my 'pick just one' topic
using the following-sibling:: axis was flawed.
I need to check that
none of my input data has been filtered out
by my poor scripting.
src is of the form
<section>
<qna>
<topic/>
</qna>
</section>
with 7 sections
I can count input nodes <qna> OK.
I'm getting better at sorting etc,
but my output was missing about
40 qna's under a number of topics.
This was the symptom.
A simple check would be
1. Do a qna count on the source document
2. Transform to html (7 files)
3. Read all 7 html files and count the (no longer) qna's
4. Check that count at 1 = count at 3.
I could bodge it and add an odd tag to count,
or try and be clever and count something within
the stylesheet, but I'm not, so I won't.
With any sort/group stylesheeet its surely a risk?
Data being lost due to weak filtering.
Regards, DaveP
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: alpha comparison, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: alpha comparison, Dave Pawson |
| Re: JavaScript error in CDATA secti, David Carlisle | Date | RE: Execute HTML depending on node , Eileen Kinley |
| Month |