Subject: Re: XSL FO conformance From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:16:41 +0100 (BST) |
Rick Geimer writes: > > > a) why is <table-footer> extended, but > > <table-header> basic? why would anyone be able to implement one but > > not the other? > > Actually, most word-processing table editors, and even the Oasis table > model, do not support table footers, which is probably why this is > considered an extended feature. XSL is targetting the sad tired old world of word-processing software? god help us.... Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL FO conformance, Rick Geimer | Thread | Re: XSL FO conformance, Marcus Carr |
RE: Rant : "Microsoft is compliant , Linda van den Brink | Date | passing a variable to a stylesheet , Linda van den Brink |
Month |