Subject: Re: Attribute test problem solved From: Steve Tinney <stinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:49:37 -0400 |
> Would there be a simpler way to test than > this since I have to repeat this process with other priorities > about five more times. I'm not sure which kind of simpler way you mean, but I typically approach lookup table problems of this kind like this: class.xsl: ---------- <?xml version='1.0'?> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:variable name="class"> <c code="P" means="PRIORITY"/> <c code="F" means="FAST"/> <c code="R" means="ROUTINE"/> <c code="S" means="SLOW"/> </xsl:variable> <xsl:template name="get-secur-class"> <xsl:param name="code" select="//@secur.classif"/> <xsl:value-of select="document('')/*/xsl:variable[@name='class'] /c[@code=$code]/@means"/> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> test.xsl: --------- <?xml version='1.0'?> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:include href="class.xsl"/> <xsl:template match="/"> <xsl:variable name="secur.class"> <xsl:call-template name="get-secur-class"/> </xsl:variable> <xsl:message >Class = <xsl:value-of select="$secur.class"/></xsl:message> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> Your '//' on the select of secur.classif, by the way, is a recipe for slow performance, but perhaps you have no other choice. Steve XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Attribute test problem solved, Medina, Edward | Thread | Re: Attribute test problem solved, David Carlisle |
RE: Remove node in xml file from Vi, Ben Robb | Date | Remove node in xml file from Visual, Paal Eriksen |
Month |