Subject: Re: position() problem with // axis + parent numbering problem From: Matt Sergeant <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:13:02 +0100 (BST) |
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Warren Hedley wrote: > David Carlisle wrote: > > > > what were you expecting? It looks OK to me. > > Perhaps you wanted the (//text)[1] form which only returns one node > > (see the second half of my example in first reply). > > Thanks David and Mike. (//text)[1] was exactly what I was after - > I didn't realise you could do that. And thank you both for the > explanations. Wouldn't /descendant::text[1] be faster with most parsers? (or am I mistaken in that would produce different results?) -- <Matt/> Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions Email for training and consultancy availability. http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: position() problem with // axis, Warren Hedley | Thread | Re: position() problem with // axis, David Carlisle |
RE: Special characters in comments, Kay Michael | Date | Re: position() problem with // axis, David Carlisle |
Month |