Subject: Re: Implementing " and ' in literals From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 21:15:55 +0100 (BST) |
> Actually using C style backslash escaping would be rejected by other > parsers, I believe. So that's probably a better long term solution (and > it's prettier too!). Why would they be rejected? \ isn't a special character to xpath or xml so \" would just be the two characters. Adding a quote character such as \ just makes it harder to query attributes that have \ in their values as you have to double quote the \. This seems far mor common than wanting to make a literal string that has both " and ' in it. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Implementing " and ' in literal, Matt Sergeant | Thread | Re: Implementing " and ' in literal, Matt Sergeant |
RE: Unicode in xsl, Wendell Piez | Date | XML Lightweight Extractor Update, ssdhanoa |
Month |