Subject: RE: xsl:copy problem From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 09:24:43 +0100 |
> which is more efficient - using the xsl:variable as > suggested below or using the current() function? Speaking for Saxon only: I think it's very unlikely to make any measurable difference. Using current() is probably a microsecond or two faster, unless you need the variable for other reasons anyway. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: xsl:copy problem, Charlie Cox | Thread | RE: Microsot parser is OK (Was: Re:, Kay Michael |
RE: Simple Problem, Kay Michael | Date | RE: Template Question, Kay Michael |
Month |