Subject: Re: PassiveTex Problem From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 09:22:06 +0100 (BST) |
Sydney writes: > someone in this list, tells me using PassiveTex > instead. probably better to mail me direct with problems, but I'll answer this one now its here > I have this in my log file. > ! LaTeX Error: File `rotating.sty' not found. > ! LaTeX Error: File `ulem.sty' not found. > ! LaTeX Error: Unknown option `normalem' for package > `ulem'. you need *current* versions of packages (eg ulem), and you need the rotating package. sorry. > I don't understand those errors because I have > downloaded all zip files(22Mb) of the MikTex 1.2 > system. I am not responsible for what Christian Schenk puts in his MikTeX distribution > 2) PassiveTex and FOs Problem > > a)How to put a background image in each page? not implemented, yet, I am afraid. on my TODO list > b)How fo:float work? > I want 2 paragraph to be opposite each other, so I use > fo:float. One in the left margin, the other in the > right of the margin. > How to do this with or without fo:float? > Is it implemented in PassiveTex? no. I just implement "traditional" floats so far > c)Management of margin. > I have a lot of fo:block with margin-left attribut for > instance margin-left="200px". > But in the PDF there is no margin, so is it > implemented in PassiveTEx or is there another syntax. oh dear this is getting embarassing. I do not support "px" measurements yet, and b) I dont support margins on blocks (yet) > d)Attribute space-after.optimum > Here is the error. > 0:space-after.optimum = "0.4cm" > > ! Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted). that should have worked. can you send me a test file? > e)Is fo:inline-sequence implemented? it is called "fo:inline" these days I am updated PassiveTeX files this morning. Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
PassiveTex Problem, Sydney | Thread | RE: XSLT book, Kay Michael |
Re: Parsers vs. processors ???, Dan Morrison | Date | RE: 'unique' element query, Kay Michael |
Month |