Subject: Re: XLST Processors Performace From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 09:29:23 +0100 (BST) |
Steve Willer writes: > This is surprising to me, and is of particular interest because I was > planning to use gingerall's Sablotron due to its speed and apparent > completeness. Could you elaborate on what you think is missing and > essential? Sablotron does not have xsl:number, xsl:sort, id(), xsl:output attribute, xsl:import, and keys. No criticism of them at all, the thing looks like an excellent project, and I bet they will complete the engine soon. But as it stands, without number, sort and id(), it is useless _to me_. If you don't use those features, go for it. I gathered my info from http://www.gingerall.com/charlie-bin/get/webGA/act/sablot_man.act#i__505 Sebastian Rahtz XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XLST Processors Performace, Steve Willer | Thread | Re: XLST Processors Performace, Petr Cimprich |
RE: Defining an attribute only if n, Kay Michael | Date | Re: Back to Basics: XPath and Conte, David Carlisle |
Month |