Subject: Re: XML to HTML conversion examples From: Dan Morrison <dman@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 20:41:11 +1200 |
Miloslav Nic wrote: > > I personally find it more easily comprehensible. It looks natural to me > 1) create element > 2) add attributes > 3) create eventual subelements I would agree. The 'classic' is really a bit 'Zen' until you've thought about it three times. The 'construct-by-hand' method not only works in a more obvious way, most importantly it illustrates several useful constructs in a way that is easily re-usable. When the coder wants to proceed and develop on it for their own peculiar task, this eg is more modular. .dan. ============================================ 3.2 There once was a master programmer who wrote unstructured programs. A novice programmer, seeking to imitate him, also began to write unstructured programs. When the novice asked the master to evaluate his progress, the master criticized him for writing unstructured programs, saying: "What is appropriate for the master is not appropriate for the novice. You must understand the Tao before transcending structure." http://packetstorm.securify.com/unix-humor/tao.of.programming.html :=====================:====================: : Dan Morrison : The Web Limited : : http://here.is/dan : http://web.co.nz : : dman@xxxxxxxx : danm@xxxxxxxxx : : 04 384 1472 : 04 495 8250 : : 025 207 1140 : : :.....................:....................: : If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy? :.........................................: XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XML to HTML conversion examples, Miloslav Nic | Thread | Re: XML to HTML conversion examples, Eric van der Vlist |
RE: XSL Problem for expert, Pawson, David | Date | Re: XSL Problem for expert, Eric van der Vlist |
Month |