Subject: RE: feature request From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:33:19 +0100 |
> > So this is the way of the future for XSLT? > > > > If you can't support something in a way that > > works (entities), attempt to > > convince people that they shouldn't even want > > them in the first place ... ? > >I don't think its fair to blame XSL for all this. It is going with the >flow of things like SAX and DOM, which do not provide access to >entities. For XSLT to do otherwise would be to place a much bigger >burden on the implementors. Summary then? I continue to use the kludge to get what I need? No response from the editors? Regards, DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: feature request, Paul Grosso | Thread | Re: feature request, David Carlisle |
Re: XSL and entities, Eric van der Vlist | Date | RE: xsl Books, Linda van den Brink |
Month |