Re: Netscape Support for XSL - client vs server rant

[Dan Morrison <dman@xxxxxxxx>]

Warren Hedley wrote:
> 
> I, for one, will wait for a Netscape/Mozilla that provides a stable
> XML/XSL client implentation and is available on all 15-odd platforms
> before I even consider moving XML off the server.

So it's just a matter of support. We wish it was there, but until it's
widespread, we're making do. Server-based soltions are as Matt say, a
stepping stone, or as I say, a compromise.

> You can't seriously be sending Email at 2am on a Saturday morning?

<off-topic>
Well actually no.
The Win98 box I'm using here seems to pick a random time every time I
turn it on, usually within three days (one side oor the other) of the
real time.
EG, it's actually 7PM, but I guess this'll be timestamped 5:30. Plays
havoc with my mail threading, but hey...
This amuses me for perverse reasons of my own, so I've never tried to
fix it.
I was not posting at 2:00 AM on a Saturday Morning. It was actually
after 3. Almost accurate that time.

Strange as this may be, it was at around 4:00 AM two Thursdays ago I got
a rare bit of work-related excitement bouncing the ILOVEYOU away from
the university servers. Very seldom does the life of a sysadmin rise to
such high drama. Maybe I was looking for a repeat of past glories.
Maybe I'm just a sad bastard sometimes.

</off-topic>

:=====================:====================:
: Dan Morrison        : The Web Limited    :
:  http://here.is/dan :  http://web.co.nz  :
:  dman@xxxxxxxx      :  danm@xxxxxxxxx    :
:  04 384 1472        :  04 495 8250       :
:  025 207 1140       :                    :
:.....................:....................:
: If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy?
:.........................................:


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list