Subject: RE: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /descendant::ccc differently From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:04:10 +0100 |
> By now I thought that //foo is an abbrev form of /descendant::foo No, it's an abbreviation for /descendant-or-self::node()/foo See XPath section 2.5, the paragraphs above production rule 10, which explain why numeric predicates in this case behave the way they do. Mike K XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
converting XML+CSS to HTML only, debenedetti | Thread | RE: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /, Bjorn Boxstart |
RE: Matching Attributes with @, Kay Michael | Date | RE: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /, Bjorn Boxstart |
Month |