Subject: RE: Matching Attributes with @ From: paulo.gaspar@xxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 15:41:57 -0700 |
Yes Michael, of course I wrote wrong. I also wrote: May be this vocabulary is not consistent with the standards but having this rough generalization in mind helped me a lot to understand how to work with XSLT. It should be kept in the context of a "geometric" way of thinking about it. There is nothing formal about it. The interpretation made of it is another matter... Have fun, Paulo --- Original Message --- Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Wrote on Fri, 26 May 2000 18:18:35 +0100 ------------------ Confusion upon confusion! > On Fri, 26 May 2000, Paulo Gaspar wrote: > > > > > Each element node can have 2 basic types of descendent nodes: > > - Content; > > - Attributes. Paulo wrote wrong. Attributes are not descendents of the element they belong to, in the technical sense of the word. ----- Sent using MailStart.com ( http://MailStart.Com/welcome.html ) The FREE way to access your mailbox via any web browser, anywhere! XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Matching Attributes with @, Francois Lachance | Thread | RE: RE: Matching Attributes with @, paulo . gaspar |
Re: How to preserve a node's value , Mike Brown | Date | Re: can we use html objects in xsl, Mike Brown |
Month |