Subject: RE: XSL FO: FOP vs XEP From: "DuCharme, Robert" <Robert.DuCharme@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 10:53:25 -0400 |
Anyone comparing two programs to evaluate which one to use would certainly want to know the relative cost of the two, so you ought to add that to the chart. I realize that RenderX's pricing hasn't been worked out yet, but the fact that FOP is free and RenderX won't be is certainly relevant to such a comparison. Likewise for the open source status of each of them. Also, if the word "FAILED" next to FOP's problem areas wasn't written in bright red all uppercase letters, the page wouldn't come across as such a blatantly biased marketing piece for RenderX. Bob DuCharme www.snee.com/bob <bob@ snee.com> "The elements be kind to thee, and make thy spirits all of comfort!" Anthony and Cleopatra, III ii XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XSL FO: FOP vs XEP, David Tolpin | Thread | RE: XSL FO: FOP vs XEP, David Tolpin |
RE: variables in IE5, Kay Michael | Date | RE: Automatic Omnimark to XSLT conv, DuCharme, Robert |
Month |