Subject: Re: XSL/T Engine Comparisons From: David_Marston@xxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 12:00:54 -0400 |
Steve Carton writes: >I would like to know if anyone out here has done some sort of >comparative analysis of the various XSL/T engines, both from >speed and from "adherence" viewpoints. I believe that "conformance" is the word of choice for that latter concept. A truly complete set of conformance tests is still under development, under the auspices of OASIS. Using tests I have, I can say that I have not seen a bug-free processor. .................David Marston XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: call-template dynamically, Kay Michael | Thread | RE: XSL/T Engine Comparisons, Kay Michael |
anchors - links on the same *.xml p, Robert Koberg | Date | RE: header/footer: How to to separa, Carlos Araya |
Month |