Subject: RE: Quantifying MSXML3 support for XSLT From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 14:56:39 +0100 (BST) |
Joshua Allen writes: > at the time IE5 shipped, ours was a very good implementation > of the standard, which did have a different namespace at > the time and changed quite a bit since. We evolve as the > standards evolve, but we don't delay our product ship > schedules based on standards schedules. Shipping now > and providing updates later over the web seems to make > more sense. I think we should all print out this statement, frame it, and pin it on the wall. It seems to say everything about Microsoft's view of what the concept of "standard" is all about. Sebastian PS just for the record > ours was a very good implementation of the standard I disagree. It was nice, but its failure to implement the default rules for templates made it *intensely* annoying to use. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Quantifying MSXML3 support for , David Carlisle | Thread | RE: Quantifying MSXML3 support for , Joshua Allen |
microsoft are good guys, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Announce: Eighth Edition of XSLT/XP, G. Ken Holman |
Month |