Subject: RE: MS and XSL From: "Paulo Gaspar" <paulo.gaspar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:31:57 +0200 |
As you might have noticed, even most of MSXML3 defenders like me dislike (or hate) IE5's XSLT implementation. Making it short: MSXML3 is a beta which is MUCH more compliant with the current standard and that already more solid (IMHO) than that version. You can find a link to it from: http://msdn.microsoft.com/xml Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Lee Goddard > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 01:33 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: MS and XSL > > > Not that I want to get back to those flamings, have all those > criticising MS's provision of info re. MSIE5 and XSLT read > the W3C pace: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xmlschema-1-20000225/ > > <BLOCKQUOTE> > (in XML (with its own DTD, XSL stylesheet (Nov REC version) and > IE5 stylesheet (XSL as supported by version 5 of Microsoft's > Internet Explorer)) and HTML, with separate provision of the > schema and DTD for schemas described herein. > </BLOCKQUOTE> > > Just though I'd mention it. > lee > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: MS and XSL, Lee Goddard | Thread | Re: MS and XSL, Mike Brown |
RE: MSXML 3.0 XSLT. Does it work?, Julian Reschke | Date | RE: position(), Kay Michael |
Month |