Subject: RE: Documenting xsl code. From: Jeni Tennison <Jeni.Tennison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 17:49:52 +0100 |
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote: >The documentation language should not be restricted to any particular set of >DTD. This is -- of course -- depending on the style sheet creating the >documentation. Sure the documentation-producing stylesheet determines the documentation that can be used, but it would be kinda nice if we could all use the same documentation standard because (a) we'd only have to learn that one standard to understand other people's documentation and (b) we could have lots of different stylesheets giving different formats to the same documentation without each person having to think up their own. Plus, using namespaces, anyone can always build extensions on top of what we use: I'd view it not as a restriction but as a foundation. Cheers, Jeni Dr Jeni Tennison Epistemics Ltd, Strelley Hall, Nottingham, NG8 6PE Telephone 0115 9061301 ? Fax 0115 9061304 ? Email jeni.tennison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Documenting xsl code., David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Documenting xsl code., Imran Rashid |
Re: Combining XML data, Jeni Tennison | Date | recursive trees is xml, sivaji |
Month |