Subject: RE: MS XML Parser 3 and WML From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 11:08:39 +0200 |
> Also, I currently use a pretty horrible CDATA string to > return the correct > <!DOCTYPE> for WML which does work but looks vile! When I > try to use the > <xsl:doctype> command to insert the correct string I get a > server message > about this command not being allowed in the current > namespace. Microsoft > documentation (for v3) does not mention this command at all > although it was > mentioned in v2.5 documentation! Does anyone know of a more > beautiful way > of doing this? The correct way of doing this is using the doctype-system or doctype-public attribute on the xsl:output element. I don't know if MSXML3 supports this. If it doesn't, you're probably stuck with your CDATA hack for now. Linda XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: msxml, Joshua Allen | Thread | RE: MS XML Parser 3 and WML, George Prezerakos (E |
Re: problems with forms and XSL, David Carlisle | Date | RE: string without %20 in HTML imag, Jarno Elovirta |
Month |