Re: XSL as a Programming Language

Subject: Re: XSL as a Programming Language
From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:34:00 +1000
At 15:41 20/07/2000, Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:

Perl is almost useless without the extensions written in C.

Now that's what I call flamebait! Are you sure you really mean this Paul?

Semantics of XSLT constructions is powerful enough +
XSLT has one serious advantage comparing to other
'traditional'  languages  - it is a first nice mix of dataflow
with processing code.  Maybe there are / were better
attempts - I don't know.

I would vote for Omnimark, as a user of it.

XSLT isn't worth a pile of beans without
regular expressions, even if it has a lot
of nice "structural" functionality.

J

-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread