Subject: RE: Best XSLT processor? From: Eckenberger Axel <Extern.Eckenberger@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:07:11 +0200 |
> From: Linda van den Brink [mailto:lvdbrink@xxxxxxx] > First read this FAQ http://www.netcrucible.com/xslt/msxml-faq.htm to > understand the issues with MSXML (the processor you're > using). Different > versions of it are going around and one of them doesn't > implement XSLT, but > a very outdated version of XSL. > > If you want to switch to another processor I'd suggest SAXON. > Very very > compliant. There is a new Version of the Msxml parser (July beta) which has about 98% compatibitilty (http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=699) with the current XSLT standard. So this statement might be a bit single sided ... at least in my humble opinion. Axel XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Best XSLT processor?, Linda van den Brink | Thread | How dynamic is XSL?, Søren Neigaard |
RE: XSL and blank textarea, Sven Macke | Date | Character numbers, Ewout Kanger |
Month |