Subject: RE: Suggestion for XSLT 2.0 From: Matthew Bentley <Matthew.bentley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:46:47 +1200 |
>PS. Considering attribute to be ordinary child >element also simplifies a model ( and 'everything' ). >the name of child element. Considering >PCDATA to be a special element <_> also >simplifies some things. In fact this all is MinML Thanks for the response, but I disagree on these points: I -usually- want to create separate default templates for elements, attributes and text() nodes, which your suggestions above would make difficult, if not impossible. Cheers, M@ ****************************************************************** Warning: This email, including any attachments, is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. Republication and redissemination, including posting to news groups or web pages, is strictly prohibited without the express prior consent of Brooker's Limited. ****************************************************************** XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Suggestion for XSLT 2.0, Paul Tchistopolskii | Thread | sax / special charcter problem (?), gauti |
Re: Suggestion for XSLT 2.0, Paul Tchistopolskii | Date | Re: Suggestion for XSLT 2.0, Heiner de Wendt |
Month |