RE: Non-validating XSL processors

Subject: RE: Non-validating XSL processors
From: Matthew Bentley <matthew.bentley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 08:04:20 +1000
>But the simple way to solve the problem (assuming that it's a real problem
>and not imagined) is to preprocess the source XML to replace the ampersands
>with something else, and then postprocess the output to put them back
again.

Thanks Mike - this is actually what I've been doing - I translate from '&'
to '$!$' - I was just wondering whether theres an alternative-
Matt
=====================================================================
WARNING -This e-mail, including any attachments, is for the 
personal use of the recipient(s) only.
Republication and re-dissemination, including posting to news 
groups or web pages, is strictly prohibited without the express
prior consent of
Thomson Legal & Regulatory Group Asia Pacific Ltd 
ACN 058 914 668
=====================================================================


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread