Subject: RE: SAX or DOM for XSLT From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:57:04 +0100 |
> "The DOM works best for XSL Tranformations .....". > Does any one know if this means that we wont be able to use > XSLT in msxml3 > without creating two DOM instances - will there be support > for large volumes of source XML via SAX2? All current XSLT processors require the source document tree to be held in memory, and this imposes a practical limit on the size of data file that you can transform. The amount of memory will vary between processors depending on the tree implementation, but the general rule still applies. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: SAX or DOM for XSLT, Joshua Allen | Thread | RE: SAX or DOM for XSLT, Kay Michael |
RE: Mozilla M18 and XSLT?, Linda van den Brink | Date | RE: when to use keys?, Kay Michael |
Month |