Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL)

Subject: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL)
From: "Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)" <lee.pollington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:39:30 +0100
I am currently putting some recommendations together for my company as to
which parsers & XSLT engines we should use. Now I'd love not to recommend
MSXML as from what I have seen it does not implement XSLT. However the need
for speed is always thrown back. That's an argument in itself, I prefer
early rendering and/or caching, but there can be times you need to parse &
transform on the fly.

I suppose XT might be a compromise, however I don't believe it is 100%
compliant (please correct me). Really I'd like to use Saxon as it is well
supported and has excellent compliance and error messages, but is a little
slow.

If anyone has any comments or suggestions as to criteria or arguments
(details as opposed to "it's bad") I can use then please let me know.

regards
Lee

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Kay Michael [mailto:Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx]
 Sent: 16 October 2000 10:57
 To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
 Subject: RE: JavaScript and XSL
 
 
 > I am a newbie, so please excuse my ignorance.  Yes, I have 
 > read lots and lots.
 
 I hope you have read http://www.netcrucible.com/xslt/msxml-faq.htm
 
 Generally if you ask questions about the Microsoft dialect of 
 XSL on this
 list, the response you get is "upgrade to XSLT".
 
 Mike Kay
 
 > <?xml version="1.0"?>
 > <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl";>
 > 
 
 
  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread