Subject: Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL) From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 00:18:50 -0600 (MDT) |
Paul Tchistopolskii wrote: > I think, the real story is that at some point Mike realized that XT is not > good enough for him. Correct. > Why this simple situation has to be reflected in such > a strange discussion I don't understand. Someone mentioned that XT had no support. I pointed out that there is some support -- 4xt.org. But then I added that 4xt.org's support for the XT-using community is unfocused and there has not been any progress in the areas where XT is, IMHO, most in need of improvement. I mentioned some of these areas, and I expressed disappointment in the slow pace of XT development since it was abandoned by James Clark almost a year ago. What's so hard to understand? :) - Mike ____________________________________________________________________ Mike J. Brown, software engineer at My XML/XSL resources: webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA http://www.skew.org/xml/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript a, Paul Tchistopolskii | Thread | Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript a, G. Ken Holman |
Re: Adding or modifying by path, Mike Brown | Date | trax.openxml.org coming back?, Mike Brown |
Month |