Subject: RE: A simple question From: Oscar Gonzalez <oscar.gonzalez@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:27:31 +0200 |
I don't understand your answer (it doesn't have answers!). Have you any experience in XSLT in high-traffic (put 200hps) websites? -----Original Message----- From: Paul Tchistopolskii [mailto:paul@xxxxxxx] Sent: sábado, 21 de octubre de 2000 4:08 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: A simple question > Do you think that use of XSLT transformations is suitable for heavy-traffic > sites? What is "heavy-traffic"... 100-200 hps ? More ? What is "suitable" ? Is it "suitable" to be five - ten times as slow as static page ( could be more. I'm surprized with the overhead of some popular servlet engines ). Well... I assume we are not going to go into too much non-XSLT detail so this means we should simplify some things. ( I in fact I doubt there are 2 heavy-traffic websites using the same architecture ). So if simplifying some things : If you're not using caching : I think the answer should be "no". If you are using caching ( even brutal one, like, for example, AxKit ) - I think the answer should be : "yes". > Using which processor? Does not really matter, I think. Rgds.Paul. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: A simple question, Paul Tchistopolskii | Thread | Re: A simple question, Paul Tchistopolskii |
Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript a, Paul Tchistopolskii | Date | samples to solve, suresh talluri |
Month |