Subject: RE: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL) From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:00:45 +0100 |
Mike Brown > SAXON only started doing this with version 5.5, which is only > a few weeks > old. If you read the release notes you would see the > reasoning behind it. > It is 'anticipatory conformance' (anticipating XSLT 1.1) whereas when > MSXML did it, it was 'irresponsible disregard for the recommended > extension function interfaces' because at that time there was > no hint that > it would ever be accepted practice. I'm beginning to feel sympathy with MS on this one. My guess, Mike Kay looks ahead to 1.1, whereas MS, trying to be fully conformant, say no, having been beaten about the head for non-conformance for months. I'd guess time will smooth this one out. DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript a, Paul Tchistopolskii | Thread | Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript a, Mike Brown |
Re: samples to solve, Miloslav Nic | Date | RE: mathml xsl stylesheets? + emacs, DPawson |
Month |