Subject: RE: Implementing recursion (Was Re: Char node-type) From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 12:42:12 -0000 |
> If I recall, scheme (and XSL's parent, DSSSL) mandate that > implementations perform tail recursion elimination. XSLT of course > hardly mandates anything about implementaions at all. It seems unwise to me to mandate anything that isn't verifiable. Mandating that the processor can handle a recursion depth of 1000 is one thing, mandating how it should achieve this is another. Even then, specifying limits is a difficult area because it depends both on the XSLT processor and on the platform it runs on. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, Kay Michael |
Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, David Carlisle | Date | Performance versus legibility, Richard Birkby |
Month |