Subject: RE: Result Tree Fragments From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 16:11:06 -0000 |
> I have been using Saxon 5.5.1 to help me understand the XSLT > spec, but I've come to a point where I can't reconcile Saxon's behaviour > with the way I read the spec. Section 11.1 of the spec describes Result Tree > Fragments, and in particular, describes how operations permitted on them are > a subset of those allowed on node-sets. In Saxon 5.5 I relaxed the restrictions on use of result tree fragments, (a) to anticipate the published requirements for XSLT 1.1, and (b) to emulate the behavior of the MSXML3 beta product. This was a regrettable departure from my usual policy of strict conformance, especially as Microsoft withdraw the feature in their final release. I have reverted to the previous situation in Saxon 6.0, where you need to use the saxon:node-set() extension function. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Result Tree Fragments, Franz Figl | Thread | xsl-include, Elena Vorster |
RE: Parameter/Variable values as at, Kay Michael | Date | RE: Overriding templates, Kay Michael |
Month |