Subject: Re: [xsl] performance of copying all source to result From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:55:24 GMT |
wouldn't match="*" be quicker than <xsl:template match=" a | applet | b | big | body | br | caption | cite | code | col | colgroup | dd | div | dl | dt | em | font | form | frame | frameset | head | h1 | h2 | h3 | h4 | h5 | h6 | hr | html | i | iframe | img | link | li | map | meta | noframes | ol | p | param | pre | s | script | small | span | strong | style | sub | sup | td | th | title | tr | tt | ul | var | table "> you can still overide that with more specific templates for elements you don't want to copy. Also, if there are any elements for which you want always want to copy the whole branch, you may find it quicker to use copy-of select="." rather than <xsl:copy and xsl:apply-templates. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] performance of copying all so, Evyatar_Kafkafi | Thread | RE: [xsl] performance of copying al, Evyatar_Kafkafi |
[xsl] performance of copying all so, Evyatar_Kafkafi | Date | [xsl] xsl:call-template & performan, Hillyard, Matthew |
Month |