|
Subject: Re: [xsl] performance of copying all source to result From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:55:24 GMT |
wouldn't match="*" be quicker than
<xsl:template match=" a | applet | b | big | body | br | caption |
cite | code | col | colgroup | dd | div | dl | dt | em | font |
form | frame | frameset | head | h1 | h2 | h3 | h4 | h5 | h6 | hr |
html | i | iframe | img | link | li | map | meta | noframes | ol |
p | param | pre | s | script | small | span | strong | style |
sub | sup | td | th | title | tr | tt | ul | var | table ">
you can still overide that with more specific templates for elements you
don't want to copy.
Also, if there are any elements for which you want always want to copy
the whole branch, you may find it quicker to use copy-of select="."
rather than <xsl:copy and xsl:apply-templates.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] performance of copying all so, Evyatar_Kafkafi | Thread | RE: [xsl] performance of copying al, Evyatar_Kafkafi |
| [xsl] performance of copying all so, Evyatar_Kafkafi | Date | [xsl] xsl:call-template & performan, Hillyard, Matthew |
| Month |