Subject: [xsl] Beginners and the XSLT spec From: "Bob DuCharme" <bobducharme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 12:04:49 -0500 |
I'm writing something on issues for XSLT beginners to keep in mind when they read the XSLT specs (http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt and http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt11/) and would like input from any beginners about what makes the spec difficult for them to follow. Like any W3C spec, the XSLT Recommendation and 1.1 Working Draft are A) *the* primary resources and B) written for people who already understand most of the terminology used, which can frustrate novices. I don't want to start a thread on What's Wrong With the XSLT Spec here; I'm writing something to address an issue that isn't the spec's job to address: XSLT newcomers' difficulties with it. For example, which often-used terms have definitions that are difficult to dig up (top-level? NCName? QName?) Which abstractions are abstract enough that it took you a while to realize that they applied to your problem after all? Feel free to e-mail me privately. Bob DuCharme www.snee.com/bob <bob@ snee.com> "The elements be kind to thee, and make thy spirits all of comfort!" Anthony and Cleopatra, III ii XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Status of FOP, Nikolai Grigoriev | Thread | [xsl] Netscape 6 and XSLT?, Bob DuCharme |
RE: [xsl] performance of copying al, Evyatar_Kafkafi | Date | [xsl] Netscape 6 and XSLT?, Bob DuCharme |
Month |