Subject: RE: [xsl] qname + uri From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 10:13:24 -0000 |
> In a testing application I'm writing, I have a need to > 1.validate a given ID value as being a valid qname. The current version of Saxon has a static method com.icl.saxon.om.Name#isQName() which should be very easy to call from XSLT. > > 2. I also need to validate a uri + fragment as being valid. I've come to the conclusion that isn't possible. A URI is only valid if it uses a protocol name that has been registered, and the set of registered protocols changes with time. Saxon allows any string to be used as a URI, until it's dereferenced, at which point it must be a URL acceptable to Java. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] qname + uri, Dave Pawson | Thread | Re: [xsl] qname + uri, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] comparing strings (and hu, Kay Michael | Date | RE: [xsl] dates, databases, and mul, Kay Michael |
Month |