Subject: Re: [xsl] Fallback from document() error From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 13:58:16 +0100 |
I would gladly accept any form of exception handling. I have proposed xsl:fallback as it is already a part of XSLT spec so the only syntactic change is an increase in the number of elements xsl:fallback can be used in and I do not consider reasonable to have 2 different exception mechanisms in one language. Are there any plans from XSLT working group? Kay Michael wrote: > > There is certainly a need for some kind of exception handling mechanism > here, though I'm not sure xsl:fallback is the right answer. > > Mike Kay > > > Being quite often plagued by problems with > > document('foo.xml') function when foo() does not exist > > I was wandering about means how to solve it. > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list -- ****************************************** <firstName> Miloslav </firstName> <surname> Nic </surname> <mail> nicmila@xxxxxxxxx </mail> <support> http://www.zvon.org </support> <zvonMailingList> http://www.zvon.org/index.php?nav_id=4 </zvonMailingList> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Fallback from document() , Kay Michael | Thread | Re: [xsl] Fallback from document() , David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] Fallback from document() , Kay Michael | Date | Re: [xsl] Fallback from document() , David Carlisle |
Month |